
Life changes. Your legal arrangements can change with it.

A separation agreement or court order reflects the circumstances of your family at a particular moment in time. Children grow up. Incomes change. People move, remarry, lose jobs, start businesses. The arrangement that worked five years ago may not be the right one for your family today.
BC family law recognizes this. Both court orders and separation agreements can be modified when circumstances change significantly. The process depends on what you are changing, whether an agreement or a court order is involved, and how cooperative the other party is.
This article covers the four most common types of modifications we handle: parenting arrangements, spousal support, child support arrears, and Section 7 expenses. Each has its own legal standard and its own path forward.
The governing standard: what counts as a material change
Material change is a specific legal concept. It is not enough that time has passed, that you feel the arrangement is unfair, or that you would prefer different terms. The change must be:
This standard exists for good reason. Courts do not want families relitigating their arrangements every time circumstances shift slightly. The bar is meaningful. But when the change is real and the impact is substantial, the law provides a genuine path to a different outcome.
The threshold for a material change is higher for final court orders than for interim ones. If you have an interim order in place while a matter is ongoing, the bar to revisit it is lower than for a final order. Know which one you have before you assess your position.
1. Modifying parenting arrangements
Parenting arrangements, covering both parenting time and decision-making responsibility, are among the most commonly varied family law orders. They are also the ones most directly tied to the best interests of the child, which is the governing standard for any parenting variation.
The material change test applies, but the best interests of the child standard runs alongside it. Even if there has been a material change, the court will only vary a parenting order if the change produces an arrangement that better serves the children.
Common grounds for varying parenting arrangements
From our files: Parenting time, revisited as a child grows
A child's parenting time had been set when she was four months old. By the time she was nearly nine, she was asking to spend more time with her father.
The court recognized the material change: a child who had grown from an infant to a school-aged child with her own expressed preferences was not the same child whose schedule had been set years earlier. The court ordered equal parenting time on a week-on, week-off basis.
The lesson: parenting orders set in infancy are almost always reviewed as children develop. Courts expect it and the law provides for it.
2. Varying spousal support
Spousal support orders and agreements can be varied when there has been a material change in the financial circumstances of either party. This works in both directions: a recipient whose circumstances have improved may face a reduction or termination, and a payor whose income has dropped significantly may apply to reduce what they pay.
The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, while not strictly binding, give both parties and courts a framework for what support should look like given current incomes. A significant divergence between the current support amount and what the Guidelines would produce based on current incomes is a strong indicator that a variation is appropriate.
Common grounds for varying spousal support
From our files: Income reduced through no fault of the payor
A husband had agreed to pay spousal support based on an income of $380,000. His income subsequently dropped to $80,000 through no fault of his own, a genuine and material change that could not have been anticipated when the agreement was signed.
When the parties could not reach an agreement to vary the support, the matter went to court. The court ordered a significant reduction in the monthly support payable, recognizing that requiring a payor to maintain support obligations calibrated to an income he no longer earned was neither fair nor legally appropriate.
The lesson: a payor who continues paying at the old rate without seeking a variation accumulates no goodwill from a court. Apply promptly when circumstances change.
3. Reducing child support arrears
Child support arrears are the accumulated unpaid balance of court-ordered or agreed child support. They are treated seriously by BC law and are enforceable through the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program, which has tools including wage garnishment, suspension of driver's licences and passports, and credit reporting.
However, arrears can sometimes be reduced or cancelled by a court if the circumstances warrant it. This is not a simple application, and success is not guaranteed. Courts are protective of child support obligations. But where arrears arose because of a genuine error, an unjust order, or circumstances that made payment genuinely impossible, relief is possible.
When a court may reduce or cancel arrears
From our files: Arrears reduced to $1.00 after an order made in absentia
A father failed to appear at a court hearing where child maintenance was being determined. He had been served with the documents but did not understand the significance of attending. The judge made an order based on a much higher income than the father was actually earning.
Over time, the arrears accumulated into thousands of dollars the father genuinely could not pay. We applied to the court, presented evidence of his actual income and circumstances, and had the arrears reduced to $1.00.
The lesson: an order made without accurate income information, or without the paying parent present, is not necessarily final. There are paths to correction. But the sooner the problem is addressed, the better the outcome tends to be.
Arrears cannot be reduced simply because payment is inconvenient. Courts look carefully at whether the payor genuinely could not pay, made reasonable efforts, and is not using an arrears application as a way to avoid child support obligations altogether. Come to this application with honest, documented evidence of your circumstances.
Think your order or agreement needs updating?
A consultation with one of our lawyers will tell you whether you have grounds for a variation, what the process looks like, and how strong your position is. Backed by our money-back guarantee on the initial consultation fee.
pathwaylegal.ca/request-consultation.html | 778-557-5099
4. Clarifying or varying Section 7 special expenses

Section 7 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines covers special and extraordinary expenses for children: things like child care, health-related costs not covered by insurance, post-secondary education, and certain extracurricular activities. These are shared between parents in proportion to their incomes.
Disputes over Section 7 expenses are among the most common ongoing sources of conflict between separated parents, and they are often about scope rather than the underlying obligation. One parent believes certain expenses qualify. The other disagrees. Neither the original order nor the separation agreement was specific enough to resolve the dispute.
Common Section 7 disputes
Section 7 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines covers special and extraordinary expenses for children: things like child care, health-related costs not covered by insurance, post-secondary education, and certain extracurricular activities. These are shared between parents in proportion to their incomes.
Disputes over Section 7 expenses are among the most common ongoing sources of conflict between separated parents, and they are often about scope rather than the underlying obligation. One parent believes certain expenses qualify. The other disagrees. Neither the original order nor the separation agreement was specific enough to resolve the dispute.
Common Section 7 disputes
From our files: Section 7 expenses resolved through mediation-arbitration
A father was required to pay his share of special expenses for the children. The mother was requesting contributions to a range of expenses, some of which were legitimate Section 7 costs and some of which were not. The scope of what she was asking for had expanded significantly beyond what the parties had originally contemplated.
Rather than going to court, the parties went to mediation-arbitration. The mediator-arbitrator worked through each disputed expense, determined which ones qualified under the Guidelines, and produced a binding resolution on the outstanding matters.
The lesson: Section 7 disputes often do not need a court. A properly structured med/arb process can produce a binding, specific resolution on exactly which expenses are covered and on what terms, without the cost and delay of litigation.
How modifications actually happen in practice
When both parties agree to a change, the process is straightforward. You document the new terms in a consent order or an amended separation agreement. A lawyer drafts the document, both parties sign, and if it is a consent order, it is filed with the court. No hearing required.
When parties do not agree, a variation application is filed with the appropriate court. The applicant must demonstrate the material change and present evidence supporting the proposed new terms. The respondent has the opportunity to file a response. The matter may proceed through a case conference, a settlement conference, and ultimately a hearing if it cannot be resolved.
In many cases, a variation that starts as a contested application resolves at a settlement conference or through negotiation once both parties have legal advice and understand their realistic range of outcomes. Contested variation hearings do happen, but they are not the most common ending.
Mediation and med/arb are genuinely effective tools for variation disputes. If you and your ex can agree to try a structured process, you will almost always get to a result faster and at lower cost than through contested court proceedings.
When to get legal advice before you proceed
Not every change in circumstances will support a successful variation application. Getting legal advice before you file is almost always worth it, because the assessment you receive will tell you whether you have grounds, what evidence you need, and what a realistic outcome looks like.
Come to a consultation with:
The clearer the picture you bring in, the more specific and useful the advice you receive. We will tell you honestly whether you have grounds and what the process is likely to involve.
Life does not hold still after separation, and the law does not expect it to. If your circumstances have changed significantly and your existing arrangements no longer reflect your family's reality, there is almost always a path to something better.
We have helped families across BC update parenting plans, adjust support, reduce arrears, and clarify expense-sharing arrangements. We work resolution-first: if an agreement can be reached without court, we will find it. When it cannot, we advocate without hesitation.
We have offices in Victoria, Nanaimo, Vancouver, and Surrey, and we serve clients province-wide by video.
Journey here. A separation agreement or court order reflects your family at a particular moment in time, and life does not hold still. These are the questions we hear most often from people whose circumstances have changed.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Family law is fact-specific and the law changes. Reading this does not create a lawyer-client relationship with Pathway Legal. For advice about your situation, consult a qualified BC family law lawyer.