Discover more. If your divorce is inevitable, choose the BETTER P.A.T.H.: join our newsletter for supportive, resolution-focused information!

Val Hemminger, Founder of Pathway Legal & Inu, Pathway Legal Chief Barking OfficerOur companion animals, that is our pets, are not simply property to us. They are companions, sources of comfort, and often deeply bonded with both adults and children in the household. Until recently, however, British Columbia family law treated pets the same way it treated furniture or vehicles during a separation.
At Pathway Legal, you might have guessed by now . . . we love dogs! Putting it bluntly, we can’t imagine having our best friend balls of fiur considered a piece of property. As it turns out, other British Columbians felt that way also. That is why the law changed.
In January 2024, amendments to the British Columbia Family Law Act came into force. The new legislation introduces the concept of “companion animals” and provides clearer guidance on how courts address disputes over pets when couples separate or divorce. Companion animals are our pets.
These changes recognize the important role our pets (referred to as companion animals in the legislation) play in family life and provide a more thoughtful framework for resolving pet-related disputes.
The amended legislation no longer refers to pets simply as property. Instead, it uses the term “companion animal.”
A companion animal (ie. Our pet) is generally defined as an animal kept primarily for companionship rather than for commercial or agricultural purposes. Think about what our pets do, they demand our attention, require our care, require that we admire them at all times possible, cost us money, and are not a financial investment or resource.
Animals that are not considered companion animals under the legislation are useful animals such as:
Finally, the law has caught up with us by recognizing that our pets play a unique role in our families and their role is to be loved.

Prior to the change in law, pets were treated as ordinary personal property under the Family Law Act. Courts would decide who kept the animal in much the same way they decided who received other assets in legal disputes.
Typically, the decision focused on traditional property principles such as:
This meant that emotional bonds, caregiving responsibilities, and the animal’s well-being were rarely central considerations in the legal analysis. This meant that our adored pets were treated as “things” under the law as opposed to members of our families that we love and care for.

While pets are still technically considered property under the law, they are now treated differently from ordinary assets like vehicles, bicycles, snowboards, or household goods.
The legislation acknowledges that our pets occupy a unique position in family relationships and therefore require a more nuanced approach. In essence, a family dog has a lot more importance to a family than, let’s say, a waffle maker. Finally, the law has changed to reflect this reality.
If separating spouses cannot agree on who will be the one to keep their pets, they can ask a court to decide the issue.
Under the updated law, both the Provincial Court of British Columbia and the Supreme Court of British Columbia can now make orders about the ownership or possession of a companion animal.
Previously, to this legislation such disputes could generally only be addressed in the Supreme Court who had sole jurisdiction over property issues.
When deciding who should have ownership or possession of a companion animal, the court must now consider a range of factors set out in the legislation found under the property division sections of the Family Law Act of BC.
The courts will consider:
These factors allow the court to look beyond simple ownership and consider the actual caregiving and welfare of the animal.

The legislation encourages separating spouses to reach their own agreement about what will happen to their companion animal.
A written agreement can address matters such as:
Under the Family Law Act, spouses can agree to:
Creating a clear agreement can help avoid future disputes and provide certainty for both parties.
Although spouses can agree to share possession of a companion animal, a court cannot force you to have “joint custody” of your pet. Although we sometimes think of our pets as our fur babies, the courts do not consider them as our children.
If the parties cannot reach an agreement and the matter goes before a judge, the court generally cannot order shared possession or joint ownership of the animal.
This approach is intended to reduce ongoing conflict between former partners.

The amended legislation recognizes that companion animals often play an important role in children’s lives.
When deciding who should keep the animal, courts may consider the relationship between the companion animal and any child of the relationship.
For many children, maintaining a connection with a beloved pet can provide stability and emotional support during the difficult transition of a separation or divorce.
Having a one-on-one meeting with a lawyer to discuss your particular circumstances may be a useful place to start if you are going through a separation and concerned about your pets and who's going to end up keeping them
Your lawyer can help you with:
Understanding how the law now treats companion animals is an important step in protecting both your interests and the well-being of your pet.